ABSTRACT
Background: It has been almost three years since the COVID-19 outbreak, yet evidence of its impact on the cancer care landscape remains scant. The present single-center study examines patterns in gynecological cancer diagnoses before and during the pandemic. Method(s): All female patients diagnosed in our academic hospital with gynecological cancer, between January 2017 and December 2020, were retrospectively identified. Pre-defined subgroup analyses were performed in patients who had been newly diagnosed during 2020 and in the pre-pandemic 3-year period. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization for Good Clinical Practice. Result(s): In total, 1,193 women were included in this case-control study;1,001 (83.91%) were identified in the pre-pandemic period as a control, while 192 (16.09%) cases were allocated in the pandemic group. The two cohorts were similar regarding demographic and clinical characteristics. For the pre-pandemic period, the mean yearly number of patients with newly identified cancer was highest for endometrial (149;44.61%), followed by ovarian (92;27.5%) carcinomas. During the first year of the pandemic, the number of new diagnoses significantly decreased by 42.5% (from 334 to 192) for all types of malignancies combined (one sample t-test p-value= 0.014). Declines ranged from 36.96% to 49% for ovarian and endometrial cancer, respectively. Conclusion(s): This is the first study to appraise a timely snapshot of the effect of COVID-19 on newly diagnosed gynecological tumors in a European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO)-certified center in Greece, demonstrating an alarmingly sharp decline in the number of new cases during the pandemic. It is of utmost importance the gynecologic oncologists to ensure the continuum of care for their patients. [Formula presented] Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding(s): Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Copyright © 2023 European Society for Medical Oncology
ABSTRACT
Aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of fungal infections in COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) patients, to identify potential risk factors and to investigate whether differences in patients' outcomes are depicted. Material-Methods: This prospective observational study included critically ill patients diagnosed with COVID-19 that were admitted from 1/9/2020 to 1/11/2021 in ICU of the 1st Respiratory Department of Sotiria Chest Diseases Hospital. Epidemiologic characteristics, severity of disease, medication, outcome and complications were recorded. Result(s): Out of 300 patients included (213 men, 60,4+/-13,23 (mean+/-SD) years-old), 22 (7,3%) developed fungal infections (16 COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis, 5 COVID-19 Associated Candidemia and 1 both). They were 6 female & 16 male, 55,73+/-13,28 years-old. Most patients had co-infections with multi-drug resistant bacteria. Patients with fungal infections were statistifically more on high dose of corticosteroids, invasive mechanical ventilation and renal replacement treatment (p<0.05). They had statistically more positive blood and bronchial secretion cultures, as well as more incidents of septic shock, venous thromboembolism and varotrauma (p<0.05). Their PaO2/FiO2 ratio on admission was statistically lower (p<0.05). Finally, after adjustment for confounfing factors and ICU days, they were at higher risk of dying (50% mortality). Conclusion(s): Fungal infections are a significant co-infection in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Those patients seem to have more severe respiratory failure on admission, be on higher doses of corticosteroids and in need of organ failure support. They also seem to develop more complications of COVID-19 and be at a higher risk of dying.
ABSTRACT
Introduction & Objectives: Patients with high risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who experience BCG failure have limited bladder preserving treatment options as radical cystectomy currently represents the standard therapeutical approach. Systematic immunotherapy (IO) has changed the landscape in advanced bladder cancer and is currently being investigated in NMIBC. Based on the hypothesis that intravesical administration will not be related with severe adverse events, we evaluated the role of intravesically administered durvalumab in NMIBC patients after BCG failure. Material(s) and Method(s): An open label, single-arm, multi-center, phase II clinical trial was conducted. A run-in phase had the objective to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of durvalumab and to exclude a detrimental effect on disease relapse by this strategy. Durvalumab was administered for a total of 6 instillations per patient at consecutive levels of 500, 750 and 1000 mg. Phase II has as primary end point the 1-year high-grade-relapse-free (HGRF)-rate. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, and high-grade progression-free rat at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Result(s): Thirty patients were enrolled (run in phase: 9, phase II: 21). One patient withdrew consent prior to receiving study treatment, so 29 patients were included in efficacy and toxicity analyses. Mean age was 66.5 years. MTD of durvalumab was set at 1000 mg as no dose related toxicities (DLTs) occurred at any level studied. Three of 9 patients included in the run-in phase (33.3%) were tumor free one month after the last durvalumab instillation, therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected by the futility analysis. Western blot showed that durvalumab remained stable in urine during instillation. One patient died from Covid-19, 3 months after the last durvalumab administration. All patients concluded at least 1 year follow up. One-year HGRF rate was 34.6%. HGRF rates at 1, 3 and 6 months was 73%, 65.3% and 50% respectively. Five patients (17%) experienced a T2 or above disease relapse. Five out of the six patients who received 500mg or 750mg of durvalumab relapsed within 1 year. When efficacy analyses were restricted to patients receiving 1000mg of durvalumab, 1-year HGRF rate was 35%. Interestingly, 2 out of 2 patients with only CIS disease at baseline experienced a tumor complete response, which was durable and was maintained at least for a year. No severe adverse events were noted. The most common adverse event was Grade 1 hematuria. Conclusion(s): Intravesical IO using durvalumab was proved to be feasible with an excellent safety profile. Oncological results seem to be promising and comparable with other bladder preserving strategies in BCG failure with the advantage of a better safety profile. Further study of intravesical IO in high-risk patients with NMIBC after BCG failure is warranted.Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: The aim of the study was to investigate the association between type-2 diabetes mellitus, other underlying diseases and obesity with the outcomes of critically ill Covid-19 patients in Greece. METHODS: In this retrospective observational multi-centre study, data and outcomes of 90 RNA 2109-nCoV confirmed critically ill patients from 8 hospitals throughout Greece, were analysed. All reported information stand through April 13th 2020. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 65.5 (IQR 56-73), majority were male (80%) and obesity was present in 34.4% of patients most prevalent to younger than 55 years. Hypertension was the prevailing comorbidity (50%), followed by cardiovascular diseases (21.1%) and type-2 diabetes (18.9%). At admission, common symptoms duration had a median of 8 (IQR 5-11) days. A 13.3% of the patients were discharged, 53.4% were still in the ICUs and 28.9% deceased who were hospitalised for fewer days than the survivors [6 (IQR 3-9) vs. 9 (IQR 7-14.5) respectively]. Aging was not a risk factor but diabetes deteriorates the outcomes. Obesity poses a suggestive burden as it was more notable in deceased versus survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Type 2 diabetes and obesity may have contributed to disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 critically ill patients in Greece.